Were all the natives subject to this unimaginable cruelty?
No, those who were not exposed to this cruelty were forced to work in the mines. Others died of disease and malnutrition. The Ecomienda System greater increased the cruelty to the point where the natives just simply committed suicide. Seven thousand babies died in three months and by 1496, the population of Espanola had decreased from eight million to four million. By 1508, it was less than 100,000 and by 1518, it was less than 20,000. Scholars say that in 1535, the native population of Espanola was less than twenty!
The killing of natives through pit spiking
We always hear of Native Americans being great warriors. Why didnt they fight back?
Do not be indoctrinated by European fabrications. It is a myth that Native Americans were savage and fierce warriors. This was fabricated to justify the Europeans waging war on a literally helpless nation of people. When Columbus arrived in the Western islands in 1492, the natives were very docile for they had no reason to be hostile towards Columbus who, at first, showed no aggression towards them. The natives were a peaceful people who were very esoteric and had not previously engaged in many battles. However, the natives did try to launch several unsuccessful attacks and ambushes, but with the combination of superior weapons, cannons, dogs, swords and sickness, the natives were wiped out. The Spanish even burned the natives crops so that they would starve. David E. Stannard, author of American Holocaust, stated that if every white person and every black person in America died today, it could not measure up to the death of Native Americans by the hands of Columbus and his Spanish counterparts.
How could someone be so sadistic?
Spain and Europe was plagued by many diseases. In Spain, only two social classes existed. The wealthy were the monarchs and the poor were the remaining population. The social structure caused inflation which produced national famine and malnutrition. This caused an outbreak of street crimes and violence. This was the cause for a very chaotic society with little law enforcement to protect the common people. Criminals began to form resistance parties against the King and Queen. Only the rich were protected. Within years to come, many of the traditionalist turned to religion in which were bits and piece of Catholicism and Druid Paganism. The political government ordered the round up of these religious practitioners and executed thousands by burning them at the stake. Among the poorer class, there was a staggering infant mortality rate. Three out of ten babies in Spain did not live long enough to see their first birthday. The people who could not take care of their children sold them to the upper class as slaves. Children slaves were just as expensive as adult slaves and female slaves were even more expensive and men would pay higher prices for female children for their own sexual pleasures. Spanish men purchased girls as young as six years of age for sex. For a family wanting to increase the price on the sale of a girl child, a rich Spanish noble would pay double for a pregnant girl. To increase the pay, the father would impregnate his young daughter in order to gain more money. Soon, the rich stopped paying for slaves and began abducting children from the streets. Columbus was a product of this environment. Violence was rapid throughout Europe. There were riots, witch hunts, lynch mobs, prostitutes and torture. Historians will claim that cannibalism originated with the islanders. It has been documented that ritualistic cannibalism existed in Europe, including Spain, Rome, Ireland and Portugal. In 1476 in Milan Spain, a man was torn into pieces by an enraged mob and his dismembered limbs were eaten by his attackers. In Paris and Lyon, Huguenots were killed and butchered and their various body parts were sold on the streets in a meat market. This is why Spain never condemned Columbus for his treatment of the Native Americans because it was done during the time of Conquest.
The burning of Natives
Discover: To make known or visible - to obtain sight or knowledge for the first time.
Conquest: The act of conquering territory appropriate in battle, overcome by force of arms, collect.
When referring to Christopher Columbus, it was not a discovery but it was a conquest. Most historians will agree that the Columbus story has been altered a great deal and herofied. However, they will try to stay away from various details concerning his role in the Transatlantic Slave Capture. Professor Robert H. Fuson claims that Columbus encountered warlike and unattractive natives. The truth is that, according to Columbus own logs, the natives showed nothing but hospitality and love for Columbus and his crew. It was also documented that Columbus thought of these people as very attractive and even handsome. If it was not for the natives, Columbus and his crew would have starved to death in 1492. Professor Fuson goes on to state that Columbus did not run Indian slaves but that history misrepresented and misinterpreted Columbus. Fuson goes on to say that Columbus had nothing but love and respect for the natives and that he had the utmost intent to simply introduce them to Christ and ignore the fact they there was gold on the land. Fuson insists that this is a true account, based on the fact that Columbus was a devout Christian. Professor Fuson states that Columbus was courageous, loyal, religious and the best navigator of his time. Lets take a look at another devout Christian.
The 911 deaths orchestrated by Christian Minister Jim Jones
There is much documented proof that Columbus was a swindler, charlatan, pirate, thief, fanatic, hypocrite, liar, slave runner, murderer, alcoholic as well as homosexual. Columbus did not have sincere admiration for the natives. Columbus only concern was securing the gold and if the natives would not willfully hand it over, he and his soldiers would take the gold by force.
Lieutenant Appleton Miles of the U.S. Army ordered the death of 400 Sioux Indians at the Massacre at Wounded Knee. Miles was also a so-called, devout Christian!
Modern slaughter of Brazilians by Christian missionaries
Is it true that Columbus was a great navigator?
On Columbus 1492 journey, he had no clue of his whereabouts. Columbus made incredible navigational errors. Columbus thought that the circumference of the earth was 204,000 miles in which he underestimated by 25%. Upon reaching the shores of Espanola, Columbus initially thought that he had landed in China. He then retracted his ignorance and thought that he was in the East Indies. Columbus made grave geographical mistakes of distance and location. However, Professor Fuson claims that Columbus had excellent knowledge of distance and speed. Dr. Fuson makes the excuse for Columbus errors by stating that the determination of latitude and longitude at the equator was not established until after 1669.. Asian and African traders had been successfully sailing to West without maps and charts since the 5th Century. Asian and African traders such as Hsu-Shen (Hexian) of the Shang Dynasty of China in 459 A.D. and the Idrisid of Morocco in the 4th and 5th Century traveled to America . Asians and Africans chartered islands by sailing on drift routes, winds and tides like the Canary Current, North Equatorial Current, Gulf Stream and Northern Western line Winds which travel West of the Atlantic. Columbus had no in-depth knowledge of these routes. He knew that they existed but he had no idea of the routes. Columbus relied on the compass for his journeys. Earlier sailors were celestial sailors who used the stars to navigate their ships to their destination. Columbus was not skilled in celestial mapping. Columbus relied on dead-reckoning navigation.
Celestial navigator tool
Could you explain what different types of Navigation there are?
At the end of the 15th Century, celestial navigation was just being developed in Europe, primarily by the Portuguese. Prior to the development of celestial navigation, sailors navigated by "deduced" (or "dead") reckoning, hereafter called DR. This was the method used by Columbus and most other sailors of his era. In DR, the navigator finds his position by measuring the course and distance he has sailed from some known point. Starting from a known point, such as a port, the navigator measures out his course and distance from that point on a chart, pricking the chart with a pin to mark the new position. Each day's ending position would be the starting point for the next day's course-and-distance measurement. In order for this method to work, the navigator needs a way to measure his course and a way to measure the distance sailed. Course was measured by a magnetic compass, which had been known in Europe since at least 1183. Distance was determined by a time and speed calculation, the navigator multiplied the speed of the vessel (in miles per hour) by the time traveled to get the distance. In Columbus' day, the ship's speed was measured by throwing a piece of flotsam over the side of the ship. There were two marks on the ship's rail a measured distance apart. When the flotsam passed the forward mark, the pilot would start a quick chant, and when it passed the aft mark, the pilot would stop chanting (the exact words to such a chant are part of a lost oral tradition of medieval navigation). The pilot would note the last syllable reached in the chant, and he had a mnemonic that would convert that syllable into a speed in miles per hour. This method would not work when the ship was moving very slowly, since the chant would run to the end before the flotsam had reached the aft mark.
Speed (and distance) was measured every hour. The officer of the watch would keep track of the speed and course sailed every hour by using a toleta or traverse board. This was a pegboard with holes radiating from the center along every point of the compass. The peg was moved from the center along the course traveled, for the distance made during that hour. After four hours, another peg was used to represent the distance made good in leagues during the whole watch. At the end of the day, the total distance and course for the day was transferred to the chart. Columbus was the first sailor (that we know of) who kept a detailed log of his voyages, but only the log of the first voyage survived in any detail. It is by these records that we know how Columbus navigated and how we know that he was primarily a DR navigator. Since DR is dependent upon continuous measurements of course and distance sailed, we should expect that any log kept by a DR navigator would have these records, and this is exactly what Columbus' log looked like. If Columbus had been a celestial navigator, we would expect to see continuous records of celestial observations, but Columbus' log does not show such records during either of the transatlantic portions of the first voyage. It has been thought by some scholars that Columbus was a celestial navigator anyway and kept his celestial records hidden for some unknown reason (this supposition is necessary to support some theories of the first landfall), but this hypothesis does not hold water. Columbus' ships were steered by helmsmen at a tiller below the quarterdeck. The helmsmen could not see the sky, so the only way they could keep a course was by magnetic compass.
The officer of the deck had his own compass and he would call down course changes as necessary. This means that the courses used aboard ship (and in the log) would have been magnetic courses. Now suppose that Columbus was using unrecorded celestial checks on his latitude as he sailed west on his first voyage. In that case, as magnetic variation pulled his course southward from true west, he would have noticed the discrepancy from his celestial observations and he would have corrected it. In other words, if Columbus was a celestial navigator, we would expect to see a series of small intermittent course corrections in order to stay at a celestially determined latitude. These corrections should occur about every three or four days, perhaps more often, but that is not what the log shows. On the first voyage westbound, Columbus sticks doggedly to his (magnetic) westward course for weeks at a time. Only three times does Columbus depart from this course, once because of contrary winds and twice to chase false signs of land southwest. In none of these cases does he show any desire to return to a celestially-determined latitude. This argument is a killer for the celestial hypothesis and was first made by Rear Admiral Bob McNitt (USN) in 1992. Well then, could Columbus have corrected his compasses by checking them against the stars -- and thus avoid the need for course corrections? This would have been possible in theory, but we know that Columbus could not have actually done this. On his return voyage in 1493, Columbus started from Samana Bay on the north Coast of Hispaniola and he made landfall at Santa Maria Island in the Azores. We know all of his DR courses and distances between these two points since they're recorded in his log. Following these courses and distances using a corrected compass puts Columbus over two hundred miles southeast of the Azores at the time he should be in sight of them. The only way to get from Hispaniola to the Azores using Columbus' recorded courses and distances is to assume that he was using an uncorrected compass and that he was pulled leftward by westerly magnetic variation in the Atlantic. Applying the same assumptions to the westward voyage shows that Columbus must have been using dead reckoning rather than celestial navigation, because of the absence of course corrections. On the westward passage, this same magnetic variation would have pulled his fleet leftward into the southern Bahama Islands, where most landfall theories put him.
In celestial navigation, the navigator observes celestial bodies (sun, moon and stars) to measure his latitude (in Columbus day, it was usually impossible to measure your longitude.) Even in ancient times, it was fairly easy to find your latitude by looking at the sun and stars, as long as you weren't too concerned about accuracy. Each star has a celestial latitude, or declination. If you know the declination of a star that is directly overhead, that's the same as your latitude on earth. Even if a star isn't directly overhead, if you can measure the angle between the star and the overhead point (called the zenith), you can still determine your latitude that way -- provided you measure the star at the time of night that it is highest in the sky. However, in the Mediterranean Sea, it's not very useful to find your latitude because your latitude is roughly the same wherever you are. In those confined waters, dead reckoning was the easiest way to navigate. It was not until the 15th Century, when Portuguese mariners began to make long voyages north and south along the Coast of Africa, that celestial determination of latitude began to be useful for southern European sailors. Columbus was from Genoa, one of the leading Mediterranean ports, and he must have learned his dead reckoning navigation from Genoese pilots. But he had spent time in Portugal and was aware of all the new ideas in navigation, including celestial navigation. So on his first voyage, he made at least five separate attempts to measure his latitude using celestial methods. Not one of these attempts was successful, in part because of bad luck and in part because of Columbus' own ignorance of celestial techniques and tools.
Could this had been the reason for Columbus poor navigation?
After navigating successfully across the Atlantic using his familiar dead reckoning methods, Columbus tried to find his latitude using the quadrant on October 30, 1492. At the time, he was at Puerto de Mares, Cuba, usually identified with the modern Puerto Gibara at about 20 degrees North latitude, but the result he obtained from the quadrant was 42 degrees. He made another reading from the same place on November 2nd and got the same flawed result. Continuing along the Coast of Cuba, Columbus again tried a quadrant latitude reading on November 21st and again came up with 42 degrees. Columbus was by now aware that the quadrant reading was incorrect, but he dutifully recorded the reading in his log anyway -- he blamed the quadrant for the bad result and remarked that he would not take any more readings until the quadrant could be fixed. Columbus made two separate attempts to measure his latitude by two different methods on December 13th while anchored in a harbor in northern Haiti. Columbus had read works by the Greek astronomer Ptolemy and he knew that Ptolemy often referred to a city's latitude according to the length of daylight at the summer solstice (more northerly places have longer daylight at summer solstice). December 13th was the day after the winter solstice in 1492, which is just as good for latitude measurements (because the length of daylight at summer solstice is about the same as the length of night at winter solstice). Columbus took the opportunity to measure the length of daylight, finding that the day was 10 hours long. This is also a fairly bad result, but Columbus did not convert the daylight measurement into a latitude probably because he did not know enough trigonometry to do so. That night, he made his second attempt to determine latitude within 24 hours. Going back to the quadrant, he again tried to determine the altitude of the North Star and this time got a reading of 34 degrees -- still far from his correct latitude of 19 degrees. Finally, on February 3, 1493, while on the return voyage, Columbus tried to determine the altitude of Polaris using both the quadrant and astrolabe, but the waves were so high he could not get a reading.
The quadrant readings Columbus obtained on his first voyage are horrible by any standard. Some have suggested that Columbus mistook another star for Polaris, but that seems ridiculous. Columbus used the stars of Ursa Minor to tell time at night, so he was very familiar with that constellation. In 1983, James E. Kelley, Jr. provided the solution to the mystery: as mentioned above, many quadrants in maritime museums have tangent scales. If Columbus misread the scale, he might have recorded the tangent of his latitude (without the decimal point) instead of his actual latitude. If that were the case, in any case, it is clear that at this point in his career Columbus was not familiar enough with celestial techniques and tools to use them successfully. So it is not surprising that on his second voyage, there is no record that Columbus attempted to use celestial navigation (except for the fraudulent eclipse longitudes). Instead, he stuck to the tried and true dead reckoning practice of "rhumbline sailing", keeping a constant west-by-south course the whole way from Gomera to Dominica in the West Indies. Columbus' measurements would only be wrong by a couple of degrees or so, which is not bad considering the technology.
How equipped were Columbus ships?
|As everyone knows, Columbus had three ships on his first voyage, the Niña, the Pinta and the Santa Maria. The flagship Santa Maria had the nickname La Gallega. It was a nao, which simply means "ship" in old Spanish which today, we might call such a ship a carrack. She was fat and slow, designed for hauling cargo, not for exploration. Some sources say that the Santa Maria was about 100 tons, meaning that it could carry 100 toneladas, which were large casks of wine. There has been much speculation about just how large such a ship would be. The best current thinking, by Carla Rahn Philips, puts the length of Santa Maria at 18 meters, keel length at 12 meters, beam 6 meters and a depth of 3 meters from keel to deck. The Santa Maria had three masts (fore, main and mizzen), each of which carried one large sail. The foresail and mainsail were square; the sail on the mizzen, or rear, mast was a triangular sail known as a lateen. In addition, the ship carried a small square sail on the bowsprit and small topsail on the mainmast above the mainsail. The Pinta was captained by Martín Alonso Pinzón, a leading mariner from the town of Moguer in Andalucia. Pinta was a caravel, a smaller, lighter and faster ship than the tubby Santa Maria. We don't know much about Pinta, but it probably was about 70 tons. Philips puts the length of Pinta at 17 meters, keel length 13 meters, beam 5 meters and depth 2 meters. She probably had three masts and most likely carried sails like those of Santa Maria, except for the topsail and perhaps the spritsail. Smallest of the fleet was the Niña, captained by Vicente Añes Pinzón, brother of Martín. The Niña was another caravel of probably 50 or 60 tons and started from Spain with lateen sails on all masts, but she was refitted in the Canary Islands with square sails on the fore and main masts. Unlike most ships of the period, Niña may have carried four masts, including a small counter-mizzen at the stern with another lateen sail. This would have made Niña the best of the three ships at sailing upwind. Philips puts her length at 15 meters, keel length 12 meters, beam 5 meters and depth 2 meters.
|As you can guess, speed of sailing vessels varies considerably with the speed of the wind. Over several days, ships of Columbus' day would average a little less than four knots. Top speed for the vessels was about eight knots and minimum speed was zero. These speeds were quite typical for vessels of the period -- and indeed, typical for the entire Age of Sail up until the time of steamships and clipper ships. So overall, 90 or 100 miles in a day would be typical and 200 phenomenal. Of the three ships on the first voyage, the Santa Maria was the slowest and the Pinta was the fastest. The differences were small, however, perhaps about 0.1 knot between them.
|Columbus Crew - Santa Maria
Cristobal Colon (Christopher Columbus), Captain
Juan de la Cosa, Owner and Master
Diego de Arana, Master-at-Arms
Pedro de Gutierrez, Royal Steward
Rodrigo de Escobedo, Secretary of the Fleet
Rodrigo Sanchez, Comptroller
Diego de Salcedo, Servant of Columbus
Luis de Torres, Interpreter
Rodrigo de Jerez
Andres de Yruenes
Antonia de Cuellar, Carpenter
Bartolome de Torres
Bartolome Garcia, Boatswain
Cristobal Caro, Goldsmith
Diego Perez, Painter
Domingo de Lequeitio
Domingo Vizcaino, Cooper
Jacomel Rico Juan, Servant
Juan de Jerez
Juan de la Placa
Juan Martines de Acoque
Juan de Medina
Juan de Moguer
Juan Ruiz de la Pena
Juan Sanchez, Physician
Marin de Urtubia
Pedro de Terreros, Cabin Boy
Pero Nino, Pilot
Pedro de Lepe
Rodrigo Gallego, Servant
Crew of the Pinta:
Martin Alonso Pinzon, Captain
Francisco Martin Pinzon, Master
Cristobal Garcia Xalmiento, Pilot
Cristobal Quintero, Ship's Owner
Francisco Garcia Vallejo
Garcia Hernandez, Steward
Juan Rodriquez Bermejo
Pedro de Arcos
Alonso de Palos
Juan Verde de Triana
Maestre Diego, Surgeon
Sancho de Rama
Crew of the Niña:
Vincente Yanez Pinzon, Captain
Juan Nino, Owner and Master
Bartolome Roldan, Apprentice Pilot
Alonso de Morales, Carpenter
Andres de Huelva
Bartolome Garcia, Boatswain
Fernando de Triana
Juan Arias, Cabin Boy
Maestre Alonso, Physician
Miguel de Soria, Servant
Pedro de Soria
Sancho Ruiz, Pilot